So, lately I came across a couple of references
to the fact Rob Gronkowski wasn't coming off rehab for the first time in
several years. He felt great. It was only shorts and shells but Gronk
absolutely dominated mini-camp. Could this be Gronkowski's best year ever –
better than his 2011 season of 90 catches, 1,327 yards and 17 touchdowns? (17!)
Let's say he had an Elvis Year, 20% better than those career numbers: 108
catches, 1,592 yards and 20 touchdowns. (20!)
Those are crazy numbers but somehow they're not
crazy when we're talking about a healthy, 26-year old, Star Lord of tight ends Rob
Gronkowski. Remember, even in his slow to get started, 15-game 2014 season
Gronkowski put up an 82 catch, 1,124 yards, 12 TD stat line.
He's at the very peak of his inimitable powers.
He's ready to smash and dash.
The Big Gronkowski.
Like every other player in the NFL, Rob
Gronkowski is just trying to get better. Thinking about Gronk having a career
year made me wonder if Brandon LaFell might reach for his ceiling in his second
year in the Patriots system. As I contemplated Julian Edelman once again
hitting the century mark in receptions. At this point I had to ask myself,
would it actually be possible for everyone who's trying to get better to
actually get better?
Probably not. First of all, the linebackers and
defensive backs on opposing defenses are all trying to get better, too. Even if
everyone did get better, it would be a zero sum game.
Still, sports is defined by numbers and off-season
is all about hopes and dreams. So, what if all of the Patriots pass catchers
simply match their career bests? What would that look like?
Caveats: I'm using Travaris Cadet's career best
as a projection for the 3rd down back. He may not win that job (it could be
James White) and his numbers fall well short of Shane Vereen's career best
(52/447/3). You can quibble with Scott Chandler's numbers as I chose his 2012
numbers (higher average yards per catch, more TDs) over his 2013 numbers (more
catches, yards; fewer TDs). I also included Brandon Gibson's numbers for the
4th wide receiver though he may not even make the roster and perhaps I
should've used Aaron Dobson's rookie numbers instead (37/519/4). Whatever.
We're just making this shit up, after all…
Player
|
Catches
|
Yards
|
TD
|
Gronk
|
90
|
1327
|
17
|
Chandler
|
43
|
571
|
6
|
Jules
|
105
|
1056
|
6
|
JoJo
|
74
|
953
|
7
|
Amendola
|
85
|
689
|
3
|
Gibson
|
51
|
691
|
5
|
Cadet
|
38
|
296
|
1
|
Totals
|
486
|
5583
|
45
|
In case you were thinking those numbers are
insane, you are correct. To confirm our diagnosis, let's look at Tom Brady's
three best seasons…
Season
|
Completions
|
Yards
|
TD
|
Brady 07
|
398
|
4806
|
50
|
Brady 10
|
324
|
3900
|
36
|
Brady 11
|
401
|
5235
|
39
|
For further context, the single season record
for completions is 468 (D. Brees), for passing yards is 5,477 (P. Manning) and
passing touchdowns is 55 (P. Manning).
Okay, the projected totals aren't that far off
from the single season records for completions and yards so it isn't completely
out of the question in the abstract. I just can't imagine New England going
that pass wacky on offense. If anything, I would think the Patriots will place
more of an emphasis on the running game in 2015 for a number of reasons; to
take advantage of defenses built to stop the pass, to minimize the hits Tom
Brady takes and to take advantage of play action out of the "12"
personnel grouping. If anything, I'd expect the Patriots to look more like 2010
than 2014 as they try to become the first team to win back-to-back Super Bowls
since they did it in 2003-04…
Year
|
Pass
|
Rush
|
%Rush
|
2014
|
609
|
438
|
41.83%
|
2013
|
628
|
470
|
42.81%
|
2012
|
641
|
523
|
44.93%
|
2011
|
612
|
438
|
41.71%
|
2010
|
507
|
454
|
47.24%
|
If anyone has a career-year in 2015, I think
it's most likely to be LeGarrette Blount.
Would I mind being wrong about that? He is my
wife's favorite player but it's not a deal-breaker.
Would I mind seeing Tom Brady shatter every one
of the NFL's single season passing record?
Sorry. I think I blacked out for just a moment
there.
Yeah. I'd be totally cool with that.
No comments:
Post a Comment