Do we ever grow up? Life is like sixty
years of high school. In the
SI article on the Broncos being the Greatest Team Ever because Peyton
Manning is the Bestest Quarterback Since God Created the Heavens and Earth, Wes
Welker let his inner child out to pout. Bill Belichick was mean to Wes Welker.
Apparently, he’s mean
to just about everyone but I guess in Welker’s case it was personal or
something. Anyway, the local media has gone berserker. It picks the Lawyer
Malloy scab, the Ty Law scab, the Willie McGinest scab, the Asante Samuel scab,
the Richard Seymour scab; it reminds the Pigskin Pundits and Bobbleheads that
Belichick is mean to them, too.
So, just a few thoughts…
There’s no reason to boo Wes Welker when
the Broncos come to The Razor. So, he dropped that pass (or it wasn’t that good
a pass to begin with). One play does not win a Super Bowl, after all. Smallest
of data samples, really.
There’s been a reprise of the chatter that
Welker wasn’t clutch because of that one Super Bowl pass Welker couldn’t come
up with. This one is easy for me because I don’t believe in “clutch” because of
the small data sample flaw and because I wouldn’t call sucking for three
quarters only to play well in the fourth quarter “clutch.” I’d call it “Jay
Cutler.”
As with the, “Which came first, the Brady
or the Belichick?” riddle, there’s been some discussion as to how much of
Welker’s success was a result of Belichick’s pigskin genius. In my own small
data sample, it seems that it was Welker’s indomitable grit that deserves all
the credit. I do agree that Welker is a great football player, a heart and soul
kind of guy. But that would give no credit to what Belichick assembled in 2007.
As I recall, Citizens of Patriots Nation took up their torches and pitchforks
over giving
a division rival 2nd and 7th round draft picks for a
guy who projected to be a #3 WR, at best.
Now that looks like an absolute steal.
As with Brady and Belichick, the answer with
Welker and Belichick is complicated, of course. Would Welker have had the
opportunity to roll up the numbers he posted if he’d played for any other head
coach? With that opportunity, would he have caught as many or more passes
playing with another quarterback besides Belichick’s pigskin Frankenstein, Tom
Brady?
There’s really no way to know.
Welker may
post Welkerian numbers in Denver this year. I think his numbers will be good
and certainly better than Brandon Stokely but whatever the over/under is for
catches and yards for Welker in 2013, I’ll take the under. I think Manning
wants to throw the deep ball to Demaryius Thomas and Eric Decker. I think he
likes TE Jacob Tamme, too. The Broncos will throw a lot but I still think it
will be hard for Welker to match his 2012 numbers with Thomas and Decker
established as #1 and #2 options.
Danny Amendola may play 16 games in 2013 and put up a 100/1,200/8 line catching
passes from Tom Brady. That’s the insanely best case scenario, admittedly. An
80/950/6 line in 15 games played (healthy heading into the playoffs) would be
good with me because I’d like to see 35 of Wes’ catches go to Josh Boyce
(35/550/6).
I have to digress
here for a moment and give a shout out to Reche Caldwell, Doug Gabriel, Jabar
Gaffney, Chad Jackson and Troy Brown. I’ve started feeling badly for them with
all the references to the 2006 wide
receiving corps as an example of how terrible things have been at the WR
position during the Belichick years except of course during the Wes Welker
years which are now over because Bill Belichick is so mean. It’s got to suck
any time your name is mentioned in the same sentence as “…worst of…”
The 2013 Patriots WR corps may wind up reminding us of 2006 but I
don’t think so. I’m looking forward to Friday night but really I’m looking
forward to Week 1 because I think the kids are alright. I’m looking for the
deep ball to return to the Patriots offense in 2013 with rookie Aaron Dobson
quickly developing into a threat deep and outside the numbers. I like Boyce and
Kenbrell Thompkins and TE Zach Sudfeld, too.
Another thing about 2006.
Brady has gotten better, since then.
No comments:
Post a Comment